The Last Samurai by Helen DeWitt engenders a variety of complicated responses. I enjoyed it; I was frustrated and annoyed by it; I was moved by it. The novel follows a single mother and her prodigy son as they make their way through London during his childhood. Far too smart for normal school, he drifts around the city (often on underground rail) and learns various languages and translates various older texts. The absent father is the animating force behind the story. Concerned by the lack of a strong male figure in their lives, the boy's mother watches and rewatches Akira Kurosawa's Seven Samurai, as though the noble men in that film may impart something to her child. Because she won't tell the boy who his father is, he goes on a sort of quest to locate him, with mixed results. This quest mirrors the film in conscious ways. Written in 2000, The Last Samurai employs tricks from that period: different font sizes and genre-collage blends in a late-postmodern mash-up that reminded me of Jonathan Safran Foer and Jennifer Egan.
DeWitt is a funny and lively writer, and I was initially drawn in. At first, the five-year-old boy learning linguistics was thrilling. But precocious children soon become annoying, and after a few hundred pages of esoteric verb conjugations in Greek or Japanese or whatever, the "brilliance" of the child felt more like someone imposing collegiate linguistics onto a fictional avatar. The writing became tedious and show-offy. Both the boy and his mother are bitterly condescending to "normal" people--those with average intelligence who appear content with their lives. The idea that the missing father may be normal haunts both characters. I was put off by this savage elitism until the last fifty pages or so, when the novel turned again, into a surprisingly poignant, Hamlet-esque meditation on the futility of life when weighed against the possibility of suicide. Life, rich with possibilities, won out, and I found the ending satisfying.
Unfortunately, I read the author's Afterword in my edition, published in 2016. DeWitt reflects on the positive response from her fans (in many ways the book is brilliant, and well written, and inspiring), but then doubles-down on the premise that society would be full of these genius children if we simply removed the barriers provided by structural education. In her mind, the protagonist isn't special, he's just been given opportunities to explore. Most kids would be translating the original Greek in The Iliad if we only let them. I'm sympathetic to reconsidering children's attention spans and potential--particularly around the negative effects of technology--but DeWitt's view is reductive. The characters in The Last Samurai ignore physical education, socialization, altruism, civic-mindedness, spirituality, and family life in their quest to be smart, to be better, to beat the old records. It makes for an anxious life, and frankly, one that seems remote from real children in the real world.